What is employee leasing?

Employee leasing, also known as professional employer organization (PEO) services or co-employment, is a business arrangement where a company contracts with an external organization to handle various human resource (HR) functions and employer responsibilities. Research has shown that outsourcing human resources to a PEO helps companies “grow 7-9 percent faster, have 10-14 percent lower turnover, and are 50 percent less likely to go out of business. (Source: napeo.org)

What are the drawbacks of employee leasing?

The drawbacks of employee leasing are

‍

• Loss of full control: One of the main drawbacks is that the client company relinquishes a degree of control over HR functions to the PEO. While the client retains control over day-to-day operations, certain HR decisions and administrative processes are managed by the PEO.
• Potential communication challenges: Effective communication is crucial in a co-employment relationship. Miscommunication or lack of coordination between the client company and the PEO could lead to issues related to employee management, compliance, and overall efficiency.
• Dependency on peo's performance: The effectiveness of employee leasing is heavily reliant on the performance and capabilities of the chosen PEO. If the PEO fails to meet expectations or encounters financial difficulties, it could impact the client company.
• Cost considerations: While cost savings are often cited as a benefit, some businesses may find that the fees charged by PEOs can be significant. It's essential to carefully assess the costs associated with employee leasing and compare them to the potential savings and benefits.
• Limited customization: PEOs typically offer standardized HR solutions. This might not be suitable for companies with unique HR policies or specific requirements that fall outside the standard offerings of the PEO.
• Complex contractual agreements: Employee leasing agreements can be complex, with detailed contractual arrangements outlining the responsibilities of both parties. It's crucial for client companies to thoroughly understand and negotiate these agreements to ensure they align with their needs.
• Employee confusion: Employees may feel confused or uncertain about changes in HR processes and the introduction of a third-party entity. Clear communication is essential to address any concerns and ensure a smooth transition.
• Potential for disruption during transition: The transition to an employee leasing arrangement may involve changes in HR systems, payroll processing, and benefits administration. If not managed properly, this transition could lead to temporary disruptions and employee dissatisfaction.
• Limited influence on benefits packages: While PEOs often offer comprehensive benefits packages, client companies may have limited influence over the specific benefits offered. This can be a drawback for businesses with unique employee benefit preferences.
• Cultural misalignment: PEOs may have their own corporate culture and way of operating. If there is a significant misalignment between the culture of the PEO and that of the client company, it could lead to challenges in collaboration and employee engagement.
• Not suitable for all industries: Employee leasing may not be suitable for industries with highly specialized workforce needs or those with unique employment arrangements. Each industry has different requirements, and some may not align well with the standardized services provided by PEOs.
• Limited flexibility: Some client companies may find that the standardized processes of a PEO limit their flexibility in managing HR functions in a way that aligns with their specific business strategies.